The Moving Image and Sound Branch of the National Archives doesn’t just hold motion pictures.  It’s also home to over 300,000 sound recordings, including those from the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court began recording its proceedings in 1955, but the court’s opinions were not recorded until the 1980s.  The recordings are organized chronologically.  Since cases are often argued over multiple days, cases can be split up between different recordings. Some newly digitized landmark cases include: Obergefell v. Hodges in 2015 required states to Read More

Fearless, adversarial journalism that holds the powerful accountable.

The Term is a podcast from Law360 for the busy U.S. Supreme Court watcher. Give us about 15 minutes each week and we'll catch you up on all the big action at the nation's highest court, along with a list of what to watch in the coming sessions. Hosts senior Supreme Court reporter Jimmy Hoover in Washington, D.C. and editor-at-large Natalie Rodriguez in New York City cut through a busy docket to focus on the key cases and developments everyone will be talking about.

The Supreme Court rulings on DACA and asylum seekers, the temporary suspension of work visas and the Muslim ban are all part of the tumultuous cycle of 'breaking news' about US immigration policy. But beyond the headlines there are quieter, more personal stories of the immigrant American experience that podcasts are custom made to tell. Check out these six podcast episodes that explore the topicwith depth, nuance, and even a little humor. Subtitle 'In quarantine with Joe Wong' Joe Wong is a brilliant bilingual comedian. In the US, he does stand-up. In his native China he hosts a popular TV

Listen to Supreme Court Of The United States with 228 episodes, free! No signup or install needed. New York v. New Jersey, No. 22O156 [Arg: 3.1.2023]. Department of Education v. Brown, No. 22-535 [Arg: 2.28.2023].

Democracy Now! stories, posts and pages that relate to Supreme Court.

A podcast about the United States Supreme Court and the legal culture that surrounds it.

‎News · 2023

An unscheduled, unpredictable Supreme Court podcast. Hosted by Will Baude and Dan Epps.

Welcome to Dissenting Opinions, a new podcast by the Constitutional Law Institute at the University of Chicago Law School. Hosted by Will Baude, each episode will have top legal minds discuss a Supreme Court case they believe is misunderstood -- with special episodes of a "deep dive" into a legal topic.

Dissents have it all: brilliant writing, surprising reasoning, shade, puns, and sometimes historical impact. Although the “losing side” writes them, they’re still important: they can provide a roadmap for future challenges or persuade other justices. Sometimes they’re just cathartic. In Dissed, attorneys Anastasia Boden and Elizabeth Slattery dig deep into important dissents, both past, and present, and reveal the stories behind them.

‎Government · 2023

‎Government · 2023

A series about how the Supreme Court got so supreme.

This guide explains the nomination process and suggests resources for further research into the nominations of more recently confirmed Supreme Court Justices.