Found 19 bookmarks
Newest
The scientists in the UK and NHS are now making very disturbing findings that add to the growing evidence that infection and persistence of the Covid virus could be one of the reasons for the increased rate of cancer that is being reported. Will be presenting material from highly…
The scientists in the UK and NHS are now making very disturbing findings that add to the growing evidence that infection and persistence of the Covid virus could be one of the reasons for the increased rate of cancer that is being reported. Will be presenting material from highly…
“The scientists in the UK and NHS are now making very disturbing findings that add to the growing evidence that infection and persistence of the Covid virus could be one of the reasons for the increased rate of cancer that is being reported. Will be presenting material from highly regarded scientists that the virus persists in our bodies as long as 2 years..another hallmark of an oncogenic virus. This is an important issue to address and find a solution to the potential of a cancer pandemic globally”
·x.com·
The scientists in the UK and NHS are now making very disturbing findings that add to the growing evidence that infection and persistence of the Covid virus could be one of the reasons for the increased rate of cancer that is being reported. Will be presenting material from highly…
Let's discuss why the idea that Sc2 causes cancer is not far-fetched, how waiting until we have definitive answers on this topic is a bad idea for us personally, and why (and what) Public Health worldwide needs to do better. (4/)
Let's discuss why the idea that Sc2 causes cancer is not far-fetched, how waiting until we have definitive answers on this topic is a bad idea for us personally, and why (and what) Public Health worldwide needs to do better. (4/)
“Let's discuss why the idea that Sc2 causes cancer is not far-fetched, how waiting until we have definitive answers on this topic is a bad idea for us personally, and why (and what) Public Health worldwide needs to do better. (4/)”
·x.com·
Let's discuss why the idea that Sc2 causes cancer is not far-fetched, how waiting until we have definitive answers on this topic is a bad idea for us personally, and why (and what) Public Health worldwide needs to do better. (4/)
SARS-COV-2 and cancer: So, what's the evidence, can SARS-COV-2 itself cause cancer, & separately can it increase risk & rapidity of death from existing cancers, & reactivate dormant cancers?
SARS-COV-2 and cancer: So, what's the evidence, can SARS-COV-2 itself cause cancer, & separately can it increase risk & rapidity of death from existing cancers, & reactivate dormant cancers?

“SARS-COV-2 and cancer: So, what's the evidence, can SARS-COV-2 itself cause cancer, & separately can it increase risk & rapidity of death from existing cancers, & reactivate dormant cancers?

Let's start with what causes cancer 🧵”

·x.com·
SARS-COV-2 and cancer: So, what's the evidence, can SARS-COV-2 itself cause cancer, & separately can it increase risk & rapidity of death from existing cancers, & reactivate dormant cancers?
We have so many oncology patients who were either in remission or improving & then after one or more covid infections their cancer came back or worsened. I dread the thought of another infection while I'm fighting bladder cancer. I 💯 believe SARS-CoV-2 can be oncogenic.
We have so many oncology patients who were either in remission or improving & then after one or more covid infections their cancer came back or worsened. I dread the thought of another infection while I'm fighting bladder cancer. I 💯 believe SARS-CoV-2 can be oncogenic.
“We have so many oncology patients who were either in remission or improving & then after one or more covid infections their cancer came back or worsened. I dread the thought of another infection while I'm fighting bladder cancer. I 💯 believe SARS-CoV-2 can be oncogenic.”
·x.com·
We have so many oncology patients who were either in remission or improving & then after one or more covid infections their cancer came back or worsened. I dread the thought of another infection while I'm fighting bladder cancer. I 💯 believe SARS-CoV-2 can be oncogenic.
A close relative was diagnosed with a rare T cell lymphoma called Mycosis fungoides today. I wish I could adequately describe how many people I know with rare cancers at the moment.
A close relative was diagnosed with a rare T cell lymphoma called Mycosis fungoides today. I wish I could adequately describe how many people I know with rare cancers at the moment.

A close relative was diagnosed with a rare T cell lymphoma called Mycosis fungoides today. I wish I could adequately describe how many people I know with rare cancers at the moment.

I WHOLEHEARTEDLY believe—no, I KNOW—it’s a result of Covid.

A thread:

·x.com·
A close relative was diagnosed with a rare T cell lymphoma called Mycosis fungoides today. I wish I could adequately describe how many people I know with rare cancers at the moment.
Denise Dewald, MD 🗽 on Twitter
Denise Dewald, MD 🗽 on Twitter

SARS-CoV-2 down-regulates p53 cancer suppressor gene expression for at least 6 months.

I don’t even want to think about what repeated infections every few months could do to the cancer rate.

Yet another reason to avoid infection. #BringBackMasks

·twitter.com·
Denise Dewald, MD 🗽 on Twitter
Dr Elisa Perego on Twitter
Dr Elisa Perego on Twitter
"17 cell cycle-related genes were up-regulated in SARS-CoV-2 patients [list] dysregulation in the expression of these genes is linked with various cancers, like breast cancer, digestive tract cancer, bone cancer, endometrial cancer, skin cancer, brain cancer, lung cancer etc."
·twitter.com·
Dr Elisa Perego on Twitter
Renaissance Man - Tomo IV on Twitter
Renaissance Man - Tomo IV on Twitter

“Our findings suggest that SARS-CoV-2 can be considered a potential risk factor for increasing the probability of developing cancer.”

💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

Told you it was ONCOGENIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Long AGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

·twitter.com·
Renaissance Man - Tomo IV on Twitter
Dr Elisa Perego on Twitter
Dr Elisa Perego on Twitter

A hard but necessary read for scientists and policy makers | cancer as a perspective sequelae of #LongCovid. We know already viruses like EBV (Epstein Barr) are triggers or drivers of many kinds of cancers. Would SARS-CoV-2 be any different?

🧵

·twitter.com·
Dr Elisa Perego on Twitter
Laura Miers on Twitter
Laura Miers on Twitter
“The authors of a 2022 study present a theoretical framework of how COVID-19 could influence the development of blood cancers. According to the researchers, an abnormal immune response to viral infections can indirectly trigger gene mutations that promote leukemia.”
·twitter.com·
Laura Miers on Twitter
Eric Feigl-Ding on Twitter
Eric Feigl-Ding on Twitter
Cancer risk? Scientists now concerned that #SARSCoV2 virus targets / interacts with 96 cancer genes— thereby “potential impact on pathways relevant to cancer affecting cell proliferation… favoring DNA degradation, preventing repair of damaging events”.
·twitter.com·
Eric Feigl-Ding on Twitter
Peter English #FBPE on Twitter
Peter English #FBPE on Twitter

Some viruses are cancer-causing ("oncogenic"). HPV and anogenital and head and neck cancers, Hepatitis B and C viruses and liver cancer; Epstein Barr virus and lymphomas etc…

I'd be surprised if SARS-CoV-2 doesn't join the list.

·twitter.com·
Peter English #FBPE on Twitter
Tom Andrews on Twitter
Tom Andrews on Twitter
SARS-COV-2 causes immunopathology: the effects of COVID upon T-cells & other parts of immune system mean direct & indirect harm, lower protection against other infectious & non infectious diseases (recurrence of chronic infections, control of new cancer, recurrence of old cancer)
·twitter.com·
Tom Andrews on Twitter
Anthony J Leonardi, MBBS, PhD on Twitter
Anthony J Leonardi, MBBS, PhD on Twitter

T cells die and get depleted

If you dysregulate this you can get things like lymphoproliferation or cancers with too little death, and depletion with too much

Don't annoy me with people in denial about T cell death signatures

The findings are robust in Covid-19

·twitter.com·
Anthony J Leonardi, MBBS, PhD on Twitter
Laura Miers on Twitter
Laura Miers on Twitter

What if Covid leads to cancer later? What will we do when we already infected everyone?

Perhaps that’s why mass infection with a novel virus isn’t advisable. Some countries understand this aspect, and some countries don’t.

·twitter.com·
Laura Miers on Twitter
David CisMan on Twitter
David CisMan on Twitter

p53 is also called “tumor suppressor gene”. Mutations in p53 are responsible for some family cancer syndromes.

If sars-cov-2 disrupts p53, we may be at the beginning of a very wild ride. Quote Tweet Mark Ungrin @mark_ung

·twitter.com·
David CisMan on Twitter