Pinboard

RT @gigaom: Maybe a little social-media fatigue isn’t such a bad idea

RT @laurenweinstein: The Times Is Losing Its 1111111111 Caller ID Number -

RT @mashable: Rebecca Black Quits Middle School After Bullying -

RT @newsyc20: Google+ Updates Real Name Policy () #trending #active

RT @newsyc20: Google+ Updates Real Name Policy () #trending #active

Apple full page ad from 1981.

Yesterday a partially-redacted document briefly appeared on the FCC website --accidentally posted by a law firm working for AT&T on the $39 billion T-Mobile deal (somewhere there's a paralegal looking for work today). While AT&T engaged in damage control telling reporters that the document contained no new information -- our review of the doc shows that's simply not true. Data in the letter undermines AT&T's primary justification for the massive deal, while highlighting how AT&T is willing to pay a huge premium simply to reduce competition and keep T-Mobile out of Sprint's hands.