I applied for Senior Frontend Developer positions. Here are some of the questions I got asked.
I still don’t think companies serve you ads based on spying through your microphone
Crucially, this was never proven in court. And if Apple settle the case it never will be.
Let’s think this through. For the accusation to be true, Apple would need to be recording those wake word audio snippets and transmitting them back to their servers for additional processing (likely true), but then they would need to be feeding those snippets in almost real time into a system which forwards them onto advertising partners who then feed that information into targeting networks such that next time you view an ad on your phone the information is available to help select the relevant ad.
Why would Apple do that? Especially given both their brand and reputation as a privacy-first company combined with the large amounts of product design and engineering work they’ve put into preventing apps from doing exactly this kind of thing by enforcing permission-based capabilities and ensuring a “microphone active” icon is available at all times when an app is listening in.
In the past three days, I've reviewed over 100 essays from the 2024-2025 college admissions cycle. Here's how I could tell which ones were written by ChatGPT : r/ApplyingToCollege
An experienced college essay reviewer identifies seven distinct patterns that reveal ChatGPT's writing "fingerprint" in admission essays, demonstrating how AI-generated content, despite being well-written, often lacks originality and follows predictable patterns that make it detectable to experienced readers.
Seven key indicators of ChatGPT-written essays:
- Specific vocabulary choices (e.g., "delve," "tapestry")
- Limited types of extended metaphors (weaving, cooking, painting, dance, classical music)
- Distinctive punctuation patterns (em dashes, mixed apostrophe styles)
- Frequent use of tricolons (three-part phrases), especially ascending ones
- Common phrase pattern: "I learned that the true meaning of X is not only Y, it's also Z"
- Predictable future-looking conclusions: "As I progress... I will carry..."
- Multiple ending syndrome (similar to Lord of the Rings movies)
Calculating Empires: A Genealogy of Technology and Power since 1500
Niche InternetThe best design system is no system | by Tony Olsson | Jan, 2022 | Medium
Structuring documentation in multi-brand design systems by Amy Hupe, content designer.
Yale Law Journal - Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox
Although Amazon has clocked staggering growth, it generates meager
profits, choosing to price below-cost and expand widely instead. Through this
strategy, the company has positioned itself at the center of e-commerce and now
serves as essential infrastructure for a host of other businesses that depend upon
it. Elements of the firm’s structure and conduct pose anticompetitive
concerns—yet it has escaped antitrust scrutiny.
This
Note argues that the current framework in antitrust—specifically its pegging competition to “consumer welfare,” defined as
short-term price effects—is unequipped to capture the architecture of market
power in the modern economy. We cannot cognize the potential harms to
competition posed by Amazon’s dominance if we measure competition primarily
through price and output. Specifically, current doctrine underappreciates the
risk of predatory pricing and how integration across distinct business lines
may prove anticompetitive.
These concerns are heightened in the context of
online platforms for two reasons. First, the economics of platform markets create
incentives for a company to pursue growth over profits, a strategy that
investors have rewarded. Under these conditions, predatory pricing becomes
highly rational—even as existing doctrine treats it as irrational and therefore
implausible.
Second, because online platforms serve as critical intermediaries,
integrating across business lines positions these platforms to control the
essential infrastructure on which their rivals depend. This dual role also
enables a platform to exploit information collected on companies using its
services to undermine them as competitors.
How the biggest consumer apps got their first 1,000 users - Issue 25 - Lenny's Newsletter
How Film School Helped Me Make Better User Experiences
Systems, Mistakes, and the Sea › Robin Rendle
From Gut to Plan: The Thoughtful Execution Framework | Spotify Design
The Interface comes to an end | Revue
Wonder Blocks: on the creation of Khan Academy’s Design System
A personal view on entry level roles in an ad agency : advertising
Interface Aesthetics - An Introduction - Rhizome
Nevertheless, the interface pushes back with its prescribed methodologies, workflows, and limitations. Interface and artist are an antagonistic pair. Perhaps the best description of the polemic between the two is one of productive cannibalism. Just as the interface evolves under the pressure of innovation to accommodate new pragmatic uses, the artists’ will continue to deconstruct and push its aesthetic and behavioral properties to their limits.
Aperture: Senior QA (2004-2005) – Tech Reflect
The magic that makes Spotify's Discover Weekly playlists so damn good — Quartz
Why editorial illustrations look so similar these days — Quartzy
On the Internet’s Next Act | steve cheney – technology, business & strategy
Google discovered the key to good teamwork is being nice — Quartz at Work
Dirty dealing in the $175 billion Amazon Marketplace - The Verge
Discussion of Expert Generalists